itd-41 proposes phase plans as its whole capability; the glossary says the phase is retired

itd-41 proposes phase plans as its whole capability; the glossary says the phase is retired

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/ledger/position.md:25 — "Do not call a position a phase (the retired sequencing unit) or a step (a landable piece of a spec); those are delivery vocabulary."
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-41-phase-negotiator.md:16 — "Ask abcd to phase a set of intents and it works backwards from what each phase should make true, proposes an ordered set of phases"

itd-41's negotiator phases a set of intents and proposes an ordered set of phases with phase acceptance bullets. The position entry calls the phase the retired sequencing unit. The draft presupposes a unit that the glossary records as no longer in use.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1075.