Development record
itd-84's validator inherits itd-81 yet renders a three-outcome verdict; itd-81 requires binary verdicts
issuewontfixminoriss-2610262042351798
itd-84's validator inherits itd-81 yet renders a three-outcome verdict; itd-81 requires binary verdicts
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-84-intent-decomposition.md:37— "The verdict has three outcomes, not pass/fail" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-81-judge-calibration.md:102— "Binary verdicts. Severity is structural (a FIX-FIRST list vs a NOTES list)"
itd-84 says its validator is a verdict-rendering agent that inherits itd-81, and gives it three outcomes rather than pass/fail. itd-81 scopes binary verdicts for every judge it governs. The validator cannot satisfy both disciplines as written.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1079.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262033588599. Same question on the same itd-81 line, here against itd-84's own FILE-AS-IS / SPLIT / HOLD verdict, which the discipline says inherits itd-81.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262042351798 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262042351798-itd-84-s-validator-inherits-itd-81-yet.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
mentions2
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.
- iss-2610262033588599itd-81 requires judge agents, intent-auditor named first, to emit binary verdicts; the intent surface has intent-auditor emit four-valued per-criterion verdicts