Development record
itd-142 states abcd ships zero skills; itd-44 routes capture through an abcd-intent-new skill
issueopenminoriss-2610262042486043
itd-142 states abcd ships zero skills; itd-44 routes capture through an abcd-intent-new skill
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-142-the-brief-creation-interview-abcd.md:13— "abcd ships zero skills" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-44-fourth-intent-kind-decision.md:111— "theabcd-intent-newskill is wrapper-only"
itd-142 makes the brief interview a command because abcd ships zero skills. itd-44's capture routing depends on the abcd-intent-new skill calling the CLI and then routing. One record says no skill exists; the other's design rests on one.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1094.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262042486043 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262042486043-itd-142-states-abcd-ships-zero-skills.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
- itd-44A Capture-Time `decision` Verdict That Routes Infrastructure Choices Into The Existing ADR Storerelated
- itd-142The brief-creation interview: abcd elicits a repository's brief in a staged conversation — narrative first, then frontier rounds that ask only what the record cannot yet settle, options at conjectural questions (at most three candidate construals, a ceiling not a target, with a null answer always available), and a per-item confirmation — distilling committed products into the brief and a ledger while the transcript is discarded. Entry is one door for both modes: a brownfield repository arrives pre-populated from embark probe coverage, provenance-stamped and still requiring confirmation; a greenfield repository is the same interview run from the all-blank coverage state. Command-shaped, because it mutates state — abcd ships zero skillsrelated