This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-192's verdict rule turns on 'this phase'; itd-24 records that phases are retired and the release is the unit.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262043005827

itd-192's verdict rule turns on 'this phase'; itd-24 records that phases are retired and the release is the unit.

A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-192-an-acceptance-criterion-whose-producer.md:25 — "Does this phase wire it?"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-24-reflect-command.md:90 — "phases are retired, so <phase-id> reads as the release tag"

itd-192 decides between MET_WITH_CONCERNS and NOT_MET by one question, 'Does this phase wire it?'. itd-24 records the ruling that 'phases are retired' and that a phase now reads as a release tag. The discipline still keys its test on a retired sequencing unit and does not say whether 'this phase' now means the release, the intent's spec or something else, so an auditor applying it has no defined scope to judge wiring against.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1108.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262042302710. Same unit problem in itd-192 as iss-2610262042302710, cited against itd-24.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262043005827
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions2