itd-1 names the agent that writes criterion verdicts 'intent-auditor'; itd-50 names it 'intent-fidelity-reviewer'.

itd-1 names the agent that writes criterion verdicts 'intent-auditor'; itd-50 names it 'intent-fidelity-reviewer'.

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-1-acceptance-gates.md:17 — "emitted by the intent-auditor agent's single-document role"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-50-loop-toward-acceptance.md:25 — "the intent-fidelity-reviewer records a NOT_MET verdict"

itd-1 states that every shipped intent's per-criterion verdicts are 'emitted by the intent-auditor agent's single-document role'. itd-50, whose whole loop is driven by those verdicts, says 'the intent-fidelity-reviewer records a NOT_MET verdict'. Two names are used for the one agent the loop depends on, and the second carries the 'review' word the audit was renamed away from, so a builder of itd-50 has to guess which agent the loop calls.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1112.