itd-168 claims the plain-language-and-options defaults for how abcd talks to the product thinker; shipped itd-201 already fixes them.

itd-168 claims the plain-language-and-options defaults for how abcd talks to the product thinker; shipped itd-201 already fixes them.

A scope leakage (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-168-the-product-thinker-sets-how-the-system.md:12 — "The product thinker sets how the system talks to them, and the defaults are plain language and options to choose from"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-201-every-question-abcd-s-agents-put-to-a.md:18 — "Every question abcd's agents put to a human is asked one at a time, in plain language, with options that widen"

itd-168 claims the ground that the product thinker sets how the system talks to them, with plain language and options to choose from as defaults. itd-201, shipped, asks every question 'in plain language, with options that widen' and fixes the register by the addressee, while its out-of-scope list hands 'the options rule's content' to itd-167 to itd-169. The same defaults are covered twice, and in incompatible ways: set by the person in itd-168, chosen by the agent from the addressee in itd-201.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1121.