itd-1 calls the single-document fidelity auditor intent-auditor; itd-34 calls the same agent intent-fidelity-reviewer

itd-1 calls the single-document fidelity auditor intent-auditor; itd-34 calls the same agent intent-fidelity-reviewer

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-1-acceptance-gates.md:17 — "emitted by the intent-auditor agent's single-document role"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-34-three-intent-kinds.md:88 — "intent-fidelity-reviewer shape-classification role (third role)"

itd-1 says per-criterion verdicts are emitted by the intent-auditor agent's single-document role, and itd-34 says the agent that performs single-document fidelity audits per itd-1 is intent-fidelity-reviewer, which gains a third role. One agent carries two names across the two records, so a reader cannot tell whether the shape-classification role belongs to the auditor the verdict pipeline dispatches.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1133.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. A shipped later ruling names the rename and the agents changelog records it; the earlier shipped intent keeps the name it was written under.