This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-81 requires binary verdicts from every judging agent; itd-28 locks reviewers to the three-valued SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK enum

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262043240944

itd-81 requires binary verdicts from every judging agent; itd-28 locks reviewers to the three-valued SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK enum

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-81-judge-calibration.md:102 — "Binary verdicts. Severity is structural (a FIX-FIRST list vs a NOTES list)"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-28-rp-reviews-into-flow.md:65 — "the canonical review verdict enum, shared by every oracle adapter"

itd-81 covers every reviewer and auditor that renders a verdict and puts binary verdicts in scope, with severity structural rather than scaled. itd-28 locks the canonical review verdict enum, shared by every oracle adapter, at three values. A review agent cannot satisfy both: its verdict is either binary or one of the three.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1135.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262033588599. Same question on the same itd-81 line, here against itd-28's locked SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK enum.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262043240944
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions2