Development record
itd-81 requires binary verdicts from every judging agent; itd-28 locks reviewers to the three-valued SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK enum
itd-81 requires binary verdicts from every judging agent; itd-28 locks reviewers to the three-valued SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK enum
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-81-judge-calibration.md:102— "Binary verdicts. Severity is structural (a FIX-FIRST list vs a NOTES list)" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-28-rp-reviews-into-flow.md:65— "the canonical review verdict enum, shared by every oracle adapter"
itd-81 covers every reviewer and auditor that renders a verdict and puts binary verdicts in scope, with severity structural rather than scaled. itd-28 locks the canonical review verdict enum, shared by every oracle adapter, at three values. A review agent cannot satisfy both: its verdict is either binary or one of the three.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1135.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262033588599. Same question on the same itd-81 line, here against itd-28's locked SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK enum.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262043240944 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262043240944-itd-81-requires-binary-verdicts-from.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
mentions2
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.
- iss-2610262033588599itd-81 requires judge agents, intent-auditor named first, to emit binary verdicts; the intent surface has intent-auditor emit four-valued per-criterion verdicts