Development record
itd-25's dredge promote calls /abcd:intent new, which itd-2609212130136102 removed
issuewontfixminoriss-2610262043297244
itd-25's dredge promote calls /abcd:intent new, which itd-2609212130136102 removed
A sequencing impossibility (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-25-dredge-cross-corpus-synthesist.md:36— "calls/abcd:intent newwith the cluster summary" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609212130136102-abcd-s-verbs-consolidate-ahoy-s-three.md:40— "version --checkbecomesupdate --check;intent newis removed"
itd-25 defines dredge promote as calling /abcd:intent new with the cluster summary. The shipped verb consolidation removes intent new outright. The draft depends on a verb the shipped record deleted, so its promotion path has nothing to call as written.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1141.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262031315138. Same draft edit as iss-2610262031315138, set against a different statement of the same current state.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262043297244 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262043297244-itd-25-s-dredge-promote-calls-abcd.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
- itd-25Patterns Surface Themselvesrelated
- itd-2609212130136102abcd's verbs consolidate: modes become flags and five checks become one lintrelated
mentions2
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.
- iss-2610262031315138itd-25's dredge promote calls /abcd:intent new, which the brief says is refused