itd-2610031259176838 tells people about 'the claim branch'; itd-2609091034175565 ruled the person-facing word is reservation and the branch prefix abcd-reserved/

itd-2610031259176838 tells people about 'the claim branch'; itd-2609091034175565 ruled the person-facing word is reservation and the branch prefix abcd-reserved/

A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-2610031259176838-someone-outside-the-project-can-reserve.md:18 — "They cannot push the claim branch abcd lists"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609091034175565-nothing-tells-an-agent-that-a-record-it.md:239 — "The word a person reads is "reservation" everywhere; the record keeps "claim" as the internal name."

The draft's press release says outside contributors cannot push the claim branch abcd lists. The shipped reservation intent ruled that the word a person reads is reservation everywhere, keeping claim as the internal name only, and refined the branch prefix from abcd-claim/ to abcd-reserved/. The draft's person-facing text uses the superseded word and branch name.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1150.