itd-1 calls the Role 1 fidelity agent intent-auditor; itd-48 calls the same agent intent-fidelity-reviewer

itd-1 calls the Role 1 fidelity agent intent-auditor; itd-48 calls the same agent intent-fidelity-reviewer

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-1-acceptance-gates.md:17 — "emitted by the intent-auditor agent's single-document role"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-48-intent-fidelity-reviewer-roles-2-3.md:24 — "abcd's intent-fidelity-reviewer agent grows from one role to three."

itd-1 says the per-criterion verdicts in a shipped intent's Audit Notes come from the intent-auditor agent's single-document role. itd-48 gives the name intent-fidelity-reviewer to the agent whose Role 1 writes those same MET/NOT_MET verdicts. One agent has two names across the records, so a reader cannot tell from the corpus which agent file or dispatch name is the real one.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1153.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. Same rename as the other records in this cluster; the shipped intent keeps the name it was written under and the changelog carries the rename.