This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-1 calls the fidelity-review sub-verb /abcd:intent audit; itd-80 ships it as abcd intent review ingest

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262043406581

itd-1 calls the fidelity-review sub-verb /abcd:intent audit; itd-80 ships it as abcd intent review ingest

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-1-acceptance-gates.md:45 — "a shipped intent's ## Audit Notes is populated only when /abcd:intent audit is run by hand"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-80-intent-lifecycle-automation.md:32 — "abcd intent review ingest ingests a verdict"

Both documents describe the intent sub-verb that puts a fidelity verdict into a shipped intent's Audit Notes. itd-1 calls it /abcd:intent audit, while itd-80 ships abcd intent review ingest. That is two verb names for one act, so a command page or a builder that follows either record can name a verb that does not exist.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1154.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. commands/intent.md documents intent audit ingest and a CLI test asserts that intent review refuses naming its successor, so itd-1's spelling is the live one.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262043406581
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions1