Development record
itd-1 calls the fidelity-review sub-verb /abcd:intent audit; itd-80 ships it as abcd intent review ingest
itd-1 calls the fidelity-review sub-verb /abcd:intent audit; itd-80 ships it as abcd intent review ingest
A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-1-acceptance-gates.md:45— "a shipped intent's## Audit Notesis populated only when/abcd:intent auditis run by hand" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-80-intent-lifecycle-automation.md:32— "abcd intent review ingestingests a verdict"
Both documents describe the intent sub-verb that puts a fidelity verdict into a shipped intent's Audit Notes. itd-1 calls it /abcd:intent audit, while itd-80 ships abcd intent review ingest. That is two verb names for one act, so a command page or a builder that follows either record can name a verb that does not exist.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1154.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. commands/intent.md documents intent audit ingest and a CLI test asserts that intent review refuses naming its successor, so itd-1's spelling is the live one.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262043406581 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262043406581-itd-1-calls-the-fidelity-review-sub-verb.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.