Development record
itd-142 says the tool never recommends; itd-42 lets the grill pre-pass recommend an answer in prose
itd-142 says the tool never recommends; itd-42 lets the grill pre-pass recommend an answer in prose
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-142-the-brief-creation-interview-abcd.md:34— "always available — the tool never recommends" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-42-coherence-aware-grill.md:94— "the pre-pass may recommend one with its reason in the prose beside the question, never as a marked option"
itd-142 states that at a conjectural question the tool never recommends. itd-42's ruled decision lets the coherence pre-pass recommend one of the standard answers, with its reason, in the prose beside the question. It forbids only a marked option. These cannot both be abcd's interview stance: one forbids any recommendation, and the other allows one in prose.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1159.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. The principle's Bounds section separates conjectural questions from record-settled ones, and itd-142 states its rule at conjectural questions only; itd-42's decision 2 concerns overlaps with named invariants and forbids a marked option.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262043456762 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262043456762-itd-142-says-the-tool-never-recommends.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
- itd-42Grill Reads an Intent Against the Brief and Its Siblings, Not Just the Glossaryrelated
- itd-142The brief-creation interview: abcd elicits a repository's brief in a staged conversation — narrative first, then frontier rounds that ask only what the record cannot yet settle, options at conjectural questions (at most three candidate construals, a ceiling not a target, with a null answer always available), and a per-item confirmation — distilling committed products into the brief and a ledger while the transcript is discarded. Entry is one door for both modes: a brownfield repository arrives pre-populated from embark probe coverage, provenance-stamped and still requiring confirmation; a greenfield repository is the same interview run from the all-blank coverage state. Command-shaped, because it mutates state — abcd ships zero skillsrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.