This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-117 puts the user-scope rules at `~/.abcd/rules.json`; itd-77 puts abcd's user-level home at `~/.abcd.noindex/`

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262043555411

itd-117 puts the user-scope rules at ~/.abcd/rules.json; itd-77 puts abcd's user-level home at ~/.abcd.noindex/

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-117-development-instructions-live-in-the.md:19 — "now live once in ~/.abcd/rules.json and inject into every"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-77-relocatable-user-home.md:17 — "That state lives in abcd's user-level home — ~/.abcd.noindex/ by default"

itd-117 says machine-wide conventions live in ~/.abcd/rules.json. itd-77 says the user-level home, where abcd keeps per-person state, is ~/.abcd.noindex/ by default. The two records name different home directories for the same user-scope layer, so someone building from either would read or write a different path.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1171.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The two homes are the old and new names of one folder, and the rename record is the one that says which holds.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262043555411
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions1