The dependency graph (itd-78) lints phase ordering; itd-24 records that phases are retired

The dependency graph (itd-78) lints phase ordering; itd-24 records that phases are retired

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-78-intent-dependency-graph.md:17 — "a phase that scopes an intent before its blocker's phase"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-24-reflect-command.md:90 — "phases are retired, so <phase-id> reads as the release tag"

One of the graph lints itd-78 promises fails when 'a phase scopes an intent before its blocker's phase', which assumes intents are scheduled into phases. itd-24 records that phases are retired in favour of releases, so the thing this lint checks is no longer part of the record.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1179.