itd-87 escalates a finding that matches a resolved or wontfixed record as a new entry; the consistency pass marks such a finding addressed and files nothing

itd-87 escalates a finding that matches a resolved or wontfixed record as a new entry; the consistency pass marks such a finding addressed and files nothing

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-87-recurrence-escalation-in-capture.md:17 — "the ledger no longer quietly folds it into the closed entry. It escalates: a new entry, citing the closed one"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2609291923559186-the-consistency-pass-runs-where-records.md:87 — "fix is marked addressed on the report, naming the record, and files"

itd-87 says a finding that matches an entry already resolved or wontfixed must not be folded into the closed entry: it becomes a new entry citing the closed one, because the recurrence is evidence that the closure may be wrong. itd-2609291923559186 G1 says that when a consistency finding's record is already resolved or won't-fix, the report marks it addressed and files nothing. The two give opposite rules for the same event in the issue ledger.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1184.