itd-86 says the cold reading's target is a design document and not code; itd-184 makes the detection reading the shipped tree against the claim record

itd-86 says the cold reading's target is a design document and not code; itd-184 makes the detection reading the shipped tree against the claim record

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-86-cold-reading-surface.md:41 — "The target is a design document. ruthless-reviewer owns diffs."
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-184-four-cold-reading-definitions-one.md:35 — "Shipped tree against the claim record"

itd-86 defines the cold reading's detection as reading one design document against the constraints visible in it, and puts reviewing code out of scope. itd-184's Detection definition reads the shipped tree, which includes source and tests, against the claim record. The two disagree on what the detection reading's object is.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1185.