This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-99 has a team of product thinkers write independently before anything is merged; itd-2610091016262335 has the team edit the brief live, each seeing the others' changes

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262044119054

itd-99 has a team of product thinkers write independently before anything is merged; itd-2610091016262335 has the team edit the brief live, each seeing the others' changes

A scope leakage (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-99-a-team-of-product-thinkers-decides-as.md:60 — "captured independently — thinkers do not see each other's answers before"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2610091016262335-the-product-thinker-and-the-technical.md:21 — "everyone edits the brief together, seeing each other's changes as they type."

itd-99 covers how a team of product thinkers authors the 'why': each writes in isolation without seeing the others' answers, then abcd collates, and real-time collaboration tooling is out of scope. itd-2610091016262335 covers the same ground with the opposite method: the team edits the brief together during a call, each person seeing the others' changes as they type. The two records claim team brief authorship with incompatible models and do not reference each other.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1189.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. itd-99 puts real-time tooling out of scope and its independence rule applies to collecting answers before aggregation; the live-editing intent is a venue for editing brief text, a different step. The only gap is a missing cross-reference.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262044119054
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions1