This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The manual-hold draft relies on the selector skipping specs with a non-done dependency, but the shipped pick selects planned intents by their blocked_by edges

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262044240923

The manual-hold draft relies on the selector skipping specs with a non-done dependency, but the shipped pick selects planned intents by their blocked_by edges

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-57-manual-hold-sentinel.md:17 — "the run seam's selector already skips specs blocked by a non-done dependency, which does the rest"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609211116005482-abcd-build-next-picks-the-readiest.md:42 — "every intent in planned/ that passes every refusal check abcd build <itd-N> runs before it starts"

itd-57 holds work by giving a spec a dependency on a sentinel spec, on the premise that the run seam's selector skips specs blocked by a non-done dependency. itd-2609211116005482 defines the candidate set as intents in planned/ passing the build's refusal checks, including not held and nothing unshipped in blocked_by. Spec-to-spec dependencies are not what the shipped selector reads, so the sentinel would hold nothing.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1204.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262044454212. Same draft edit as iss-2610262044454212, set against a different statement of the same current state.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262044240923
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions2