This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

`peers` means records held by sibling worktrees in the shipped reader, but the planned announcements ruling reserves it for sessions running now

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262044300840

peers means records held by sibling worktrees in the shipped reader, but the planned announcements ruling reserves it for sessions running now

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2609151838312703-sessions-announce-what-they-are-doing.md:120 — "the product thinker ruled that peers keeps its name for its future meaning, the sessions running now, local first and later over a private network"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609091416295622-a-session-sees-the-records-its-sibling.md:55 — "Presence or liveness: A peer holding a record says the record exists, not that a session does."

itd-2609091416295622 defines peers as a read of records that sibling worktrees and branches hold, and puts presence out of scope: a peer holding a record does not mean a session exists. itd-2609151838312703 rules that peers keeps its name for the sessions running now. One verb name is given two different concepts.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1211.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. Today peers lists records held by sibling worktrees and branches, as the shipped intent says; the planned meaning is explicitly future and captured as its own record.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262044300840
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions1