Development record
The what-next menu makes bare `abcd` write, against the stated convention that bare invocations are read-only
The what-next menu makes bare abcd write, against the stated convention that bare invocations are read-only
A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2610031215002409-under-the-board-a-short-what-next-menu.md:88— "the menu is the one exception, in a Terminal only, and the brief chapter 04-surfaces/08-abcd.md and the plugin page commands/abcd.md say so" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609150819445595-a-debt-nothing-lists-owed-fidelity.md:44— "bare invocations are read-only by convention here"
itd-2610031215002409 rules that the menu under bare abcd writes the waiting-on status in a Terminal, and lists only the board chapter and the abcd command page as the promises it reverses. itd-2609150819445595 relies on the general convention that bare invocations are read-only. The convention as stated no longer holds, and the planned record does not amend it.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1221.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. The convention sentence is made inside a shipped intent about its own verb; the planned exception does not touch that verb.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262044392775 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262044392775-the-what-next-menu-makes-bare-abcd-write.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
- itd-2609150819445595A shipped intent's owed fidelity review is listed, so the debt is paidrelated
- itd-2610031215002409A 'what next?' menu under the board offers the next step, in a Terminal and in a Claude Code sessionrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.