This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-8 writes the lifeboat packer as `/abcd:disembark pack <repo> <path>`; shipped itd-88 writes it as `disembark <repo> to <dest>`

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262044466021

itd-8 writes the lifeboat packer as /abcd:disembark pack <repo> <path>; shipped itd-88 writes it as disembark <repo> to <dest>

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-8-with-code-bundling.md:15 — "Running /abcd:disembark pack <repo> <path> --with-code packs not only the synthesised brief"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-88-lifeboat-coverage-experiment.md:41 — "The packer (disembark <repo> to <dest>), embark, and the round-trip"

Both documents name the command that packs a repository into a lifeboat. itd-8 hangs --with-code on /abcd:disembark pack <repo> <path>. itd-88, which places the packer in the disembark sequence, writes it as disembark <repo> to <dest>. One operation has two command forms, so the flag itd-8 adds has no agreed command to attach to.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1229.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The shipped intent says which spelling holds and the command page agrees with itd-8, so nothing needs an edit.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262044466021
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions1