Development record
itd-8 writes the lifeboat packer as `/abcd:disembark pack <repo> <path>`; shipped itd-88 writes it as `disembark <repo> to <dest>`
itd-8 writes the lifeboat packer as /abcd:disembark pack <repo> <path>; shipped itd-88 writes it as disembark <repo> to <dest>
A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-8-with-code-bundling.md:15— "Running/abcd:disembark pack <repo> <path> --with-codepacks not only the synthesised brief" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-88-lifeboat-coverage-experiment.md:41— "The packer (disembark <repo> to <dest>), embark, and the round-trip"
Both documents name the command that packs a repository into a lifeboat. itd-8 hangs --with-code on /abcd:disembark pack <repo> <path>. itd-88, which places the packer in the disembark sequence, writes it as disembark <repo> to <dest>. One operation has two command forms, so the flag itd-8 adds has no agreed command to attach to.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1229.
Grounds
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262044466021 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262044466021-itd-8-writes-the-lifeboat-packer-as-abcd.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.