This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

Shipped itd-6 says abcd has no oracle logic and no routing of its own; itd-2609170822093401 has abcd propose and apply a model tier for each agent

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262044485589

Shipped itd-6 says abcd has no oracle logic and no routing of its own; itd-2609170822093401 has abcd propose and apply a model tier for each agent

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-6-rp-mcp-only-integration.md:22 — "Zero abcd-side oracle logic, zero "which preset?" prompts, zero hard-coded routing."
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2609170822093401-the-oracle-choice-is-one-repo-wide-value.md:22 — "abcd now ships its own proposal for which model tier each of its agents"

itd-6 says abcd never picks an oracle and has zero abcd-side oracle logic and zero hard-coded routing. itd-2609170822093401 ships a bundled table with a tier for each agent. At run time it picks the winning row against the provider connections configured, and sends a step straight to a provider that can be reached. abcd cannot have no routing logic and also ship its own routing proposal and resolver.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1231.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. abcd now has a resolver and routing proposal (internal/core/oracle), consistent with adr-25's opt-in adapters; the itd-6 statement is the dropped single-integration premise.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262044485589
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions2