itd-55's foundations auditor claims to dig out an intent's unstated premises; the grill shipped by itd-42 already questions hidden assumptions

itd-55's foundations auditor claims to dig out an intent's unstated premises; the grill shipped by itd-42 already questions hidden assumptions

A scope leakage (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-55-first-principles-foundations-auditor.md:30 — "excavate the implicit premises as a load-ranked inventory"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-42-coherence-aware-grill.md:34 — "It still grills vague terms and hidden assumptions"

itd-55 adds an audit that digs out the unstated premises of a document, including an intent's Why This Matters. It sets itself apart from the grill, which it says checks criteria only. itd-42 says the grill still questions vague terms and hidden assumptions, on top of its new coherence tier. Both surfaces claim an intent's unstated premises, and itd-55's line between itself and the grill ignores the questioning of hidden assumptions that itd-42 delivered.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1236.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262034293679. The grill that itd-42's line describes no longer exists (itd-42 carries a 2026-09-21 re-scope note), so the overlap is with the planning interview and is one edit in itd-55.