Shipped itd-69 says the brief-change derivation gate (itd-61) produced it; itd-61 is still a draft that has not yet given abcd that gate

Shipped itd-69 says the brief-change derivation gate (itd-61) produced it; itd-61 is still a draft that has not yet given abcd that gate

A sequencing impossibility (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-69-plugin-metadata-lockstep-update.md:43 — "Drawn out from a human brief edit by the brief-change derivation gate"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-61-brief-change-derivation.md:24 — "abcd gains a brief-change derivation: when a human edits the brief directly"

itd-69's provenance line says the brief-change derivation gate of itd-61 turned a human brief edit into this intent. itd-61 is in drafts, and its press release describes the derivation as something abcd will gain. A shipped record cannot have come from a gate whose own record is not yet delivered. Either the gate exists in a form itd-61 does not record, or itd-69's provenance is wrong.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1237.