This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-44 puts its refusal for the decision kind into a Python plan path (`_choose_candidate_kind`, `plan_single`); in shipped itd-80, planning is the native `abcd intent plan` verb

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262044540397

itd-44 puts its refusal for the decision kind into a Python plan path (_choose_candidate_kind, plan_single); in shipped itd-80, planning is the native abcd intent plan verb

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-44-fourth-intent-kind-decision.md:142 — "_choose_candidate_kind reads suggested_kind but only routes values in"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-80-intent-lifecycle-automation.md:32 — "abcd intent plan <itd-N> mints a spec, writes the bidirectional link, sets kind (default standalone)"

itd-44 says the plan path reads suggested_kind through _choose_candidate_kind and routes only _PLAN_CANDIDATE_KINDS. Anything else falls through to an interactive prompt. itd-44 adds its refusal to plan_single/reclassify. itd-80 says the shipped abcd intent plan <itd-N> mints a native spec, writes the link, and sets kind with standalone as the default. The two records describe different plan paths, and itd-44's guard targets one the shipped verb does not have.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1238.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262034181775. Same draft edit as iss-2610262034181775, set against a different statement of the same current state.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262044540397
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions2