This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The verdict verb is `abcd intent review ingest` in itd-80 and `abcd intent audit` in itd-123

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262045156888

The verdict verb is abcd intent review ingest in itd-80 and abcd intent audit in itd-123

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-80-intent-lifecycle-automation.md:32 — "abcd intent review ingest ingests a verdict."
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-123-the-intent-audit-says-audit-abcd-intent.md:21 — "abcd intent audit emits the same per-criterion"

itd-80's shipped scope names the verb that ingests a fidelity verdict abcd intent review ingest. itd-123 renames it, so that abcd intent audit emits the same per-criterion verdicts. One verb has two names, and anyone who types the name itd-80 gives gets a verb that has been renamed.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1262.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The two ends are the before and after of one shipped breaking rename, and the later record already says which holds.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262045156888
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions1