Development record
itd-6 still calls the lifeboat verdict pass lifeboat-oracle and re-audit; itd-125 renamed it a review so that one word names it
itd-6 still calls the lifeboat verdict pass lifeboat-oracle and re-audit; itd-125 renamed it a review so that one word names it
A naming conflict (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-6-rp-mcp-only-integration.md:45— "lifeboat-oracle → fix → re-audit" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-125-the-lifeboat-verdict-says-what-it-is.md:22— "produced by an oracle, holding a review verdict — three words for one thing."
itd-125 says the lifeboat verdict file was produced by an oracle and held a review verdict, three words for one thing, and that the verb, flag, artefact and prose now all say review. itd-6's same-chat rule still describes the pass as lifeboat-oracle, fix, re-audit. That keeps the oracle and audit names itd-125 retired.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1264.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The retired names appear in a historical same-chat bullet that predates the rename; the rename record already says which spelling holds.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262045177576 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262045177576-itd-6-still-calls-the-lifeboat-verdict.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.