itd-94 has the agent run `abcd intent ready itd-93` with no other argument and read its verdict; itd-179 makes `intent ready` refuse without a grounds argument

itd-94 has the agent run abcd intent ready itd-93 with no other argument and read its verdict; itd-179 makes intent ready refuse without a grounds argument

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-94-an-intent-that-is-not-planned-cannot-be.md:19 — "it runs abcd intent ready itd-93,"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-179-the-reasoning-behind-what-was-pursued-no.md:27 — "A grounds argument on intent ready and on the capture triage routes"

itd-94's readiness flow runs abcd intent ready itd-93 with no other argument and acts on the NOT READY verdict, with exit 1 a journaled SKIP for drains. itd-179 adds a grounds argument on intent ready and on the capture triage routes, refused when absent. Under itd-179 the invocation itd-94 describes is refused before any verdict comes back.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1268.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. internal/core/intent/ready.go marks the grounds check Advisory, and commands/intent.md documents --grounds as a flag that records an entry and reports the gate unchanged; the resolved issue is the later record that says which holds.