itd-124 keeps 'audit' for checking a promise and 'lint' for checking form; itd-65 calls its docs-lint row the documentation-auditor

itd-124 keeps 'audit' for checking a promise and 'lint' for checking form; itd-65 calls its docs-lint row the documentation-auditor

A terminology drift (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-124-the-conformance-check-calls-itself-lint.md:22 — "When a verb says lint I know it's checking form — no model, no judgement."
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-65-launch-preflight-gate-suite.md:118 — "documentation-auditor row runs the docs-lint engine the front door"

itd-124 rules that a lint checks form with no model and no judgement, and that audit means checking whether we did what we said. itd-65's warn-tier documentation-auditor row runs the docs-lint engine, a deterministic form check, under the word itd-124 keeps for checking promises.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1270.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. internal/core/launch/gates.go still names the row documentation-auditor and it runs the deterministic docs-lint engine, which sits oddly beside itd-124's word rule, but the rule's acceptance criteria do not reach gate row names.