Development record
itd-46 lists `ship` and `review` among the intent sub-verbs; itd-121 says shipping an intent is a spec verb
itd-46 lists ship and review among the intent sub-verbs; itd-121 says shipping an intent is a spec verb
A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-46-abcd-intent-quoted-text-create-symmetric.md:76— "grill,plan,ship,review,reclassify,link,resolve," - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-121-type-the-id-get-your-next-move-abcd-id.md:21— "every record names its own next verb, and nobody needs to know that shipping an"
itd-46 says ship and review remain intent sub-verbs that take the intent's id, and calls that shape already correct. itd-121 says nobody needs to know that shipping an intent is a spec verb (abcd spec close), and itd-123 has since renamed the per-intent review to audit. An intent ship sub-verb and shipping only through spec close cannot both hold.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1272.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262042088869. Same itd-46 sentence and same root cause; itd-121 and itd-123 are the later records that moved ship to spec close and review to audit.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262045246595 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262045246595-itd-46-lists-ship-and-review-among-the.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
mentions3
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.
- iss-2610262042088869itd-46 lists `ship` and `grill` as existing intent sub-verbs that keep requiring an id; the build sequence says neither exists.
- itd-123The Intent Audit Says Audit