Development record
itd-3 ships the prompt hook as a Python file in hooks/; itd-66 says hooks/ ships shell and the payload carries no Python
itd-3 ships the prompt hook as a Python file in hooks/; itd-66 says hooks/ ships shell and the payload carries no Python
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-3-modular-rules-loader.md:30— "hooks/prompt_router_hook.py—UserPromptSubmithook." - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-66-launch-payload-render-parity.md:85— "no other imported entrypoint (hooks/andscripts/ship shell)"
itd-3 names the UserPromptSubmit hook as hooks/prompt_router_hook.py. itd-66 records that the payload's include roots carry no Python and that hooks/ and scripts/ ship shell, which is why it calls its Python-import criterion moot. A Python file under hooks/ cannot be shipped if hooks/ holds only shell.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1275.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. hooks/ holds only shell scripts (user-prompt-submit.sh runs the binary's prompt-router hook) and git history shows no prompt_router_hook.py; itd-66 states the payload carries no Python.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262045278708 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262045278708-itd-3-ships-the-prompt-hook-as-a-python.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.