Development record
itd-34 maps a standalone intent to a flow-next spec made by /flow-next:plan; itd-80 has intent plan mint a native spc-N record
itd-34 maps a standalone intent to a flow-next spec made by /flow-next:plan; itd-80 has intent plan mint a native spc-N record
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-34-three-intent-kinds.md:21— "A standalone intent maps 1:1 to a flow-nextspec" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-80-intent-lifecycle-automation.md:31— "A minimal native spec store (internal/core/spec): directory-as-truth spec records"
itd-34 says a standalone intent maps one to one to a flow-next spec and that its plan path calls /flow-next:plan and plan-review. itd-80 builds a native spec store in internal/core/spec, where abcd intent plan mints the spc-N record and the link itself. The two shipped records disagree on which store a spec lives in and which tool makes it.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1284.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. internal/core/spec is the spec store and PlanBundle mints a native shared spec; itd-34's own spec_id is a native spc id.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262045357230 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262045357230-itd-34-maps-a-standalone-intent-to-a.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References2
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.