This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-80 names the verdict ingest abcd intent review ingest; itd-2609150819445595 names the same review family abcd intent audit

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262045442294

itd-80 names the verdict ingest abcd intent review ingest; itd-2609150819445595 names the same review family abcd intent audit

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-80-intent-lifecycle-automation.md:32 — "abcd intent review ingest ingests a verdict"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609150819445595-a-debt-nothing-lists-owed-fidelity.md:42 — "abcd intent audit <itd-N> re-emits it on demand"

itd-80 puts the fidelity-verdict ingest at abcd intent review ingest. itd-2609150819445595 has the owed-review listing at bare abcd intent audit and the request re-emitted by abcd intent audit < itd-N>. Two verb names cover one fidelity-review family, so a caller following one record runs a verb the other does not name.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1294.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. itd-80's review ingest spelling predates the rename recorded in itd-123 and adr-40.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262045442294
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References2

mentions3