Development record

itd-53 calls the owed review a queue entry; itd-80 calls it a parked OWED receipt

issuewontfixnitpickiss-2610262045533651

A naming conflict (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-53-review-queue-auto-drain-fidelity-gate.md:22 — "enqueues a fidelity-review entry"
End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-80-intent-lifecycle-automation.md:36 — "park an OWED receipt at the ship-move"

itd-53 says closing a spec enqueues a fidelity-review entry that a drainer pays down, with entries left deferred. itd-80 says the ship-move parks an OWED receipt that ends DEAD_LETTER on failure. Both describe the one artefact the close leaves behind, under two names with two state vocabularies.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1304.

Grounds

declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The owed receipt is the artefact the ship-move leaves (internal/core/capture/auditowed.go), so the queue entry and deferred state of itd-53 are earlier vocabulary for it.

Frontmatter

id	iss-2610262045533651
type	issue
lifecycle	wontfix
severity	nitpick

.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262045533651-itd-53-calls-the-owed-review-a-queue.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗

References2

itd-53A Shipped Intent No Longer Drifts Out Of Audit Just Because Nobody Ran The Reviewrelated
itd-80An Intent Ships Itself: `planned → shipped` Follows Its Spec Closing, With A Fidelity Audit Attachedrelated

mentions1

dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.