This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-2609211913453478's record-families page has a row for step; itd-2609212103565953 says a step is a section, not a record family

issuewontfixnitpickiss-2610262045557535

itd-2609211913453478's record-families page has a row for step; itd-2609212103565953 says a step is a section, not a record family

A terminology drift (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609211913453478-one-page-in-the-glossary-maps-abcd-s.md:39 — "one row per family, intent, spec, step, bundle, issue, release, status (Now / Next / Later)"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609212103565953-a-spec-lists-its-steps-and-the-build.md:55 — "The unit below a spec is a section called steps, not a record family"

itd-2609211913453478 scopes its page as one row per family and lists step (and the rendered status) among them. itd-2609212103565953 rules that the unit below a spec is a section called steps, not a record family. The word family is used in two senses across the two records.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1306.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. The ADR cites both the ruling and the page, so it reads them together.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262045557535
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severitynitpick

References2

mentions1