This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The ideate protocol's adversarial leg gives reviewers no way to tell an ambition from a present-tense claim, so an idea about where a repository's product should go is killed because the product does not deliver it yet. On a 2026-10-31 run on a positioning idea (in abcd's own repository, where abcd is the product), both reviewers marked it fatal on current delivery gaps. The product thinker ruled that not yet built is never a reason to kill an ambition: the gap is the roadmap the exercise exists to find.

issueresolvedminoriss-2610310815034547

The ideate protocol's adversarial leg gives reviewers no way to tell an ambition from a present-tense claim, so an idea about where a repository's product should go is killed because the product does not deliver it yet. On a 2026-10-31 run on a positioning idea (in abcd's own repository, where abcd is the product), both reviewers marked it fatal on current delivery gaps. The product thinker ruled that not yet built is never a reason to kill an ambition: the gap is the roadmap the exercise exists to find.

They added two requirements. First, the product thinker chooses whether the review considers the product's current state, and by default it does not. Second, the rule holds for the product any abcd-managed repository builds, so a product thinker can ideate around their own product and not only around abcd; abcd's own repository is the proving ground, not the scope.

Grounds

  • pursued: reviewers told to ignore current delivery stop killing ambition ideas on not-yet-built gaps; a later ignore-mode verdict whose fatal attempt rests on a delivery gap would show it wrong

Frontmatter

idiss-2610310815034547
typeissue
lifecycleresolved
severityminor

mentions2