Development record
abcd land --record-review refused two reviewers' returns whose '### Verdict' section began 'Head: 9d2749a96' and 'Verdict: SHIP': 'its verdict "Head: 9d2749a96" is not one a validator writes; nothing was written'. It accepts only the verdict word alone as the first non-empty line under the heading, which the help text does not say ('each naming the head's first nine characters under one ### Verdict heading'), so a return in an equally clear shape is refused and has to be rewritten by hand.
issuewontfixminoriss-2611012124381670
abcd land --record-review refused two reviewers' returns whose '### Verdict' section began 'Head: 9d2749a96' and 'Verdict: SHIP': 'its verdict "Head: 9d2749a96" is not one a validator writes; nothing was written'. It accepts only the verdict word alone as the first non-empty line under the heading, which the help text does not say ('each naming the head's first nine characters under one ### Verdict heading'), so a return in an equally clear shape is refused and has to be rewritten by hand.
Grounds
- declined: Duplicate of iss-2610311339293870, which tracks the same refusal of a review return whose first line under ### Verdict is not the verdict word; this record's example (a return opening 'Head: 9d2749a96', refused as 'not one a validator writes') is added there as a dated note.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2611012124381670 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2611012124381670-abcd-land-record-review-refused-two.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2610311339293870abcd land --record-review refuses a return whose first line under ### Verdict does not begin with the verdict word (internal/core/landing/review.go reviewVerdict), so '**977fb39cd: SHIP**' is refused as 'not one a validator writes', yet land --help says only that each return names the head's first nine characters under one ### Verdict heading. A host that briefs its reviewers from the help, as happened on 2026-10-31, gets passing reviews refused and has to ask each reviewer to re-emit.