This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

development README record-map table omits specs release and release-gate and carries a stale personas-json migration promise

issueresolvednitpickiss-319

development README record-map table omits specs release and release-gate and carries a stale personas-json migration promise

Evidence

.abcd/development/README.md:6-7 frames the table as "one canonical home per concept" but lists only brief/intents/principles/decisions/roadmap/plans/research — omitting specs/, release/, release-gate/, all load-bearing (record-lint's spec_lifecycle/spec_id_unique/record_schema → specs; surface_coverage → release/surface.json; gate_lockstep → release-gate/README.md). :19 says personas.json "migrates to embedded Go data when the intent surface is built" — under-describing its now-shipped role as the persona_registry SSOT read by a blocker lint.

Adversarial verdict: CONFIRMED table omission (nitpick); "migration condition met" REFUTED

specs/ is a first-class record family (record_schema registers spc as a peer store; abcd <id> dispatches spc-N), not a sub-artefact of intents. The directory_coverage warn covers only specs/'s own missing README, not the parent table. The personas "condition met" framing does not survive (grill sub-verb unshipped → the intent surface is arguably not complete), so the residual is only that the parenthetical omits personas.json's shipped SSOT/lint role. Fix: add three table rows + one clause on personas.json's persona_registry role; ideally an index_drift region so the row set is gated (the iss-38 shape). Not prior art: iss-42 corrected a different row of this table.

Frontmatter

idiss-319
typeissue
lifecycleresolved
severitynitpick

mentions2