This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

persona pronoun discipline itd-79 is violated by gendered pronouns in seven intent records including a shipped intent

issueresolvednitpickiss-321

persona pronoun discipline itd-79 is violated by gendered pronouns in seven intent records including a shipped intent

Evidence

itd-79 (intents/disciplines/itd-79-persona-registry.md:18, also personas.json and intents/README.md:241): "Every persona is referred to as they/them." Violated (gendered pronouns) in: shipped/itd-100:17,25; drafts/itd-126:17,29,31; drafts/itd-97:32; drafts/itd-92:20; drafts/itd-98:28; drafts/itd-108:48; drafts/itd-128:23 (post-discipline, authored 2026-08-19).

Adversarial verdict: CONFIRMED (nitpick)

itd-79:32 names "non-attribution mentions" as in-scope, review-enforced (the persona_registry lint matches only said <Name>,, so a regex cannot reach pronouns — these slipped the review half, not a linter gap). Grandfathering refuted (itd-128 postdates the rule). docs/brief/principles carry zero gendered pronouns — these seven are the outliers. Fix requires verb-agreement edits, not a blind sed (e.g. "she has to"→"they have to", "he edits"→"they edit"). Exclude the itd-27:74 "Pocock/his" — a real prior-art author citation, not a persona. record-lint stays green (no attribution name changes). itd-79's own severity is minor; this is the review-tier half.

Frontmatter

idiss-321
typeissue
lifecycleresolved
severitynitpick

mentions11