This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

Seven registry personas are given he/she/his/her pronouns across intents/drafts (itd-92,97,98,108,126,128) and intents/shipped (itd-100), violating the they/them persona discipline (itd-79); review-enforced convention with no mechanical gate, concentrated in one 2026-08 authoring batch — a cosmetics-batch cleanup

issueresolvednitpickiss-338

Seven registry personas are given he/she/his/her pronouns across intents/drafts (itd-92,97,98,108,126,128) and intents/shipped (itd-100), violating the they/them persona discipline (itd-79); review-enforced convention with no mechanical gate, concentrated in one 2026-08 authoring batch — a cosmetics-batch cleanup

Evidence

  • Registry personas given gendered pronouns: intents/drafts/itd-92:20, itd-97:32, itd-98:28, itd-108:48, itd-126:17,29,31, itd-128:23; intents/shipped/itd-100:17,25.
  • Rule: itd-79-persona-registry.md:18, personas.json:4, intents/README.md:241, dcn-2607080000000005 -- every persona is they/them.

Refuter verdict -- CONFIRMED, severity NITPICK (recorded, not fixed)

All ten referents are registry personas (real cited authors correctly excluded); none is a first-person self-description; the narrative attribution clauses sit outside the quotes. No drafts/ exemption exists; itd-100 is shipped/. But comparable persona findings (iss-300, iss-49) are filed nitpick, and no document states the rule wrongly -- only ~7 of ~88 persona-quote files deviate, concentrated in one 2026-08 authoring batch. A natural addition to the iss-49 cosmetics batch; recording is the outcome.

Frontmatter

idiss-338
typeissue
lifecycleresolved
severitynitpick

mentions13