The core/disembark glossary term links its counterpart to interview/embark (the grill-session opening, a different bounded context) rather than the /abcd:embark unpack surface, misdirecting the reader

The core/disembark glossary term links its counterpart to interview/embark (the grill-session opening, a different bounded context) rather than the /abcd:embark unpack surface, misdirecting the reader

Evidence

• .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/disembark.md:37-38 — "counterpart to [embark](../interview/embark.md)'s inbound opening; together they bracket the portability boundary".
• interview/embark.md:5 (bounded_context: interview) defines embark as "the opening move of a grill session" — a different bounded context.
• disembark's true inbound counterpart is /abcd:embark unpack (04-surfaces/03-embark.md), which has no core/ glossary term (find glossary -iname 'embark*' → only interview/embark.md).

Adversarial verdict

CONFIRMED (nitpick). Not a dangling link (target exists) but a cross-context misdirection. Fix: repoint disembark.md:38 to the /abcd:embark unpack surface chapter, or reword to name the unpack command (no core glossary term).