The intent corpus still specifies the pre-adr-35 lifeboat model: itd-2, itd-8, itd-9, itd-10, itd-13, itd-15, itd-19, itd-22 and itd-24 variously use the retired 'disembark to home' signature, the in-tree .abcd/lifeboat/ home, or the in-tree .abcd/development/voyage/ path (itd-9's acceptance writes voyage provenance in-tree — the exact path that would fail abcd's own privacy-hygiene audit rule). The brief, glossary and roadmap were reconciled to adr-35; the intents were deliberately NOT rewritten, because an intent is a proposal with its own lifecycle and silently rewriting nine of them inside an unrelated change is worse than tracking the drift. Each reconciles when it is next planned.

The intent corpus still specifies the pre-adr-35 lifeboat model: itd-2, itd-8, itd-9, itd-10, itd-13, itd-15, itd-19, itd-22 and itd-24 variously use the retired 'disembark to home' signature, the in-tree .abcd/lifeboat/ home, or the in-tree .abcd/development/voyage/ path (itd-9's acceptance writes voyage provenance in-tree — the exact path that would fail abcd's own privacy-hygiene audit rule). The brief, glossary and roadmap were reconciled to adr-35; the intents were deliberately NOT rewritten, because an intent is a proposal with its own lifecycle and silently rewriting nine of them inside an unrelated change is worse than tracking the drift. Each reconciles when it is next planned.

Grounds

• pursued: no live intent spells the pre-adr-35 lifeboat model; a grep of non-superseded intents for 'disembark to ', '.abcd/lifeboat/' or '.abcd/development/voyage' printing a line outside itd-88's evidence would show it wrong