Development record
offer a one-tap micro-prompt channel (survey pattern) for maintainer decisions: when abcd needs a single small human ruling (a yes/no, a pick from two or three options), it renders one micro-prompt the facilitator can answer in one tap instead of a full interview session. Lifted out of itd-111's open questions during the 2026-08-15 forward-plans grill so the staleness intent keeps a clean scope; strike the open question from itd-111 when it goes through intent plan. Facilitator-touch item, homed in the facilitator-experience plan.
issueopenminoriss-230
offer a one-tap micro-prompt channel (survey pattern) for maintainer decisions: when abcd needs a single small human ruling (a yes/no, a pick from two or three options), it renders one micro-prompt the facilitator can answer in one tap instead of a full interview session. Lifted out of itd-111's open questions during the 2026-08-15 forward-plans grill so the staleness intent keeps a clean scope; strike the open question from itd-111 when it goes through intent plan. Facilitator-touch item, homed in the facilitator-experience plan.
Remedy grounds (2026-09-29)
- MCP elicitation (https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/client/elicitation, consulted 2026-09-29) restricts a request to a flat schema of enums, booleans, strings and numbers and answers with a three-action model (accept, decline, cancel); taking that shape keeps the prompt host-delegated (the host renders, abcd never draws) and lets a later MCP front door carry it unchanged.
- Rejected: abcd drawing its own terminal prompt, which breaks host delegation and cannot reach a person away from the terminal.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-230 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-230-one-tap-micro-prompt-channel.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions3
- dcn-26081500000000012026-08-15 — three forward plans adopted at a maintainer grill, absorbing the existing queue rather than adding to it: `2026-08-15-plugin-user-safety.md` (execution priority 1; owns install-experience Cut B pick-up and the v0.5.0 security remainder; fix queue opens iss-200 then iss-195), `2026-08-15-predictable-development.md` (priority 2; itd-109 promotion is the headline; absorbs the v0.5.0 consistency remainder), `2026-08-15-facilitator-experience.md` (continuous, rides along; supersedes the explainability plan's pick-up role). The plan 1/3 boundary is touch-vs-machinery: what a facilitator directly invokes or reads versus automation that guarantees behaviour without human action. Each plan admits items by a stated admission test with the ledger remaining the backlog of record. Same grill: iss-189/190 retired by SUPERSESSION, not wontfix — the defects are real, the local-patch avenue is exhausted (three BLOCKed rounds), so both resolve into the new iss-229 (the recorded 2026-08-08 galloping-probe/trueMatchEnd structural design) with their repros as its acceptance corpus; and itd-111's one-tap micro-prompt open question graduated to its own capture iss-230, homed in the facilitator plan. Rejected: wontfixing 189/190 (asserts the defects don't matter), a full 104-issue triage into the plans (stale mirror of the ledger), and executing the plans in the listed 1-2-3 order (the safety floor and the compounding accelerators come first).
- itd-111A Stale abcd Never Answers Silently
- spc-22a-stale-abcd-never-answers-silently-every-surface-that-runs