This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

`commands/launch.md` documents the release cut as three steps over two Go entry

issueresolvedmajoriss-2608231226274000

commands/launch.md documents the release cut as three steps over two Go entry points: emit the cut, compose the prose, ingest and write the heading. It never mentions the two host-run semantic passes, or the receipts they produce, or the two-commit branch shape the receipts require.

That shape is mandatory. release.yml arms receipt_gate against the release CONTENT commit, derived as <merge>^2^ on the auto-release path, so the release branch must be exactly two commits: the CHANGELOG roll, then a commit recording the receipts that name it. A receipt can never sit in the tree of the commit it names, because adding it would change that commit's sha.

The procedure is written down correctly, but in .abcd/development/release-gate/README.md — a development-tier runbook that the launch page references only in passing, as one of the files launch scaffold writes. Nothing on the path a user actually follows says the step exists.

Field hit 2026-08-23: a release cut followed the launch page end to end, produced a one-commit release branch, merged, tagged v0.6.2, and failed at Semantic-gate receipts (fail-closed) with no receipt for the armed content commit. Everything before it passed. The page's own flow was completed exactly as written and still could not ship.

The fix is on the page, not in the runbook: the ship flow gains the semantic passes and the two-commit shape as first-class steps, so following the surface produces a shippable release.

Frontmatter

idiss-2608231226274000
typeissue
lifecycleresolved
severitymajor

mentions1