Development record
After adr-2609212115255771 retired the phase, the milestone and the word roadmap, the brief outside the mental-model chapter still describes the phase as the live sequencing unit: 59 files under .abcd/development/brief mention it, among them 01-product/04-scope.md (bounded by the planned phases), and the glossary entries release, version, loop, plan and spec, whose prose says a phase sequences the work and a release falls out of completing one. itd-2609211913453478 rewrote only the mental-model chapter and repointed each entry's not_to_be_confused_with; no record carries the rest of the sweep.
After adr-2609212115255771 retired the phase, the milestone and the word roadmap, the brief outside the mental-model chapter still describes the phase as the live sequencing unit: 59 files under .abcd/development/brief mention it, among them 01-product/04-scope.md (bounded by the planned phases), and the glossary entries release, version, loop, plan and spec, whose prose says a phase sequences the work and a release falls out of completing one. itd-2609211913453478 rewrote only the mental-model chapter and repointed each entry's not_to_be_confused_with; no record carries the rest of the sweep.
Sweep progress 2026-09-29
Lane drainBrief (autonomous run A, c80832f97) swept the brief outside the files
other branches were editing. Done: 01-product/04-scope.md (the scope is the
shelves, sequenced by dependencies and rendered as the Now / Next / Later
block), the glossary entries release, version, loop, plan and spec, and the
phase-as-sequencing sites in 01-product/ (press release, context, README),
02-constraints/01-platform.md and 02-dependencies.md,
03-evidence/04-tradeoffs.md, 04-surfaces/02-disembark.md, 03-embark.md
and 07-memory.md, 05-internals/ 01, 04, 05, 07, 08 and 09,
06-delivery/README.md and the opening of 01-build-sequence.md, and the
glossary's core README, brief, reading-position and ledger/position entries
and the distribution README.
Left, and why:
- Files other branches were editing, which this lane was barred from:
02-constraints/04-naming.md(15 sites),02-constraints/03-invariants.md(1),05-internals/03-configuration.md(7),06-delivery/02-verification-matrix.md(2),06-delivery/03-out-of-scope.md(22),04-surfaces/01-ahoy.md(1),04-surfaces/04-launch.md(4),04-surfaces/05-intent.md(36) and04-surfaces/README.md(1). 04-surfaces/09-reflect.md: its whole design is phase-grained (argument, seed, output path). The chapter now says the grain is retired and that the release-grain design is owed with itd-24; restating it is a design act for that intent, not a sweep. Thereflection-composerrow of05-internals/01-agents.md(from a phase-audit receipt) goes with it.06-delivery/01-build-sequence.md: its build milestones are the brief's plumbing sequence for the Go core, a sense the phase glossary entry keeps apart and the ADR does not name. Only its opening pointer at the phase documents is swept.
Kept on purpose, as history or as another sense of the word: the retired
entries glossary/core/phase.md, milestone.md and roadmap.md;
introduced_in: phase-N provenance; links to the phase documents as history
(glossary/core/loop.md, glossary/core/ledger.md); 00-meta.md:77, whose
source list mirrors internal/core/lifeboat/mapping.go:206; the process phases
of 04-surfaces/15-prepare-this-repo.md and the grill session's phases under
glossary/interview/; and the voyage entry's lifecycle table.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2609251618079479 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2609251618079479-after-adr-2609212115255771-retired-the.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions5
- adr-2609212115255771Phases and milestones are retired: sequencing is dependencies rendered as status, the checkpoint is the derived release
- dcn-26100900000000012026-10-09 — Rulings of the product thinker on the three hand-backs of the 2026-10-07/08 autonomous drain (asked by abcd-0b, one question at a time, answers verbatim): (1) iss-2609251618079479, whether the build-sequence chapter's build-milestone sense retires with the phase: "Rewrite in today's terms" — 06-delivery/01-build-sequence.md stays a current chapter, its build order restated as dependencies with no milestones (neither retired as history nor kept as a second sense of the word). (2) iss-2610040758569116, whether an agent may run 'abcd decide accept', which stamps the person's git name as accepted_by: "Agents too, disclosed" — no guard block as for 'source ledger --flip'; the commit's Assisted-by trailer is the disclosure. (3) iss-2610030956156354's open design point, whether a step still falls back to the agent harness when the size count already sent the brief to the person's own model server and the chat call then fails: "Move to the harness" — no answer received is the trigger, not nothing sent; recorded as iss-2610090701491123, since the resolved fix stops instead.
- iss-2610030807157970The bundled ROADMAP rule domain still teaches retired phases and milestones. internal/core/rules/defaults/rules.json:34 injects 'The roadmap is intent-driven; each phase ends in a milestone.' into every managed repository on a prompt that names a roadmap, milestone or phase, although adr-2609212115255771 retired the phase, the milestone and the word roadmap (decision 8 replaces this domain with the decision's statement) and adr-2609292012006845 carries that forward. abcd's own repository masks the defect with a repo override (.abcd/rules.json:127-131), so its own sessions never see it; a sibling session's user test of an adopted repository on v0.9.0 reported it on 2026-10-03. The brief-wide sweep iss-2609251618079479 does not name the defaults file.
- itd-24Completed Releases Get A Retrospective
- itd-2609211913453478One page maps the record families, and phase, milestone and roadmap are retired