Development record
The naming register still files commands under 'later phases'; the scope page says the phase is retired as a unit of the record
issueopennitpickiss-2610262030354678
The naming register still files commands under 'later phases'; the scope page says the phase is retired as a unit of the record
A terminology drift (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/04-naming.md:66— "Reserved meta-development commands (later phases; named now to prevent collisions)" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/01-product/04-scope.md:30— "retired the phase and the milestone as units of the record"
The naming register heads its reserved commands 'later phases' and tags dredge, loot and audit as 'a later phase'. The scope page says adr-2609212115255771 retired the phase and the milestone as units of the record. The register uses a retired term as a live scheduling bucket.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 18.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262030354678 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262030354678-the-naming-register-still-files-commands.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions3
- adr-2609212115255771Phases and milestones are retired: sequencing is dependencies rendered as status, the checkpoint is the derived release
- iss-261026203122680304-naming dates its reserved commands to a later phase; the glossary retires the phase as a unit.
- iss-2610262032061118The naming register still schedules reserved commands by 'a later phase'; itd-2609211913453478 retired the phase as a unit of sequencing.