Development record
The naming register marks /abcd:intent grill staged under itd-27; the intent chapter says itd-27 is superseded
issueopenminoriss-2610262030468053
The naming register marks /abcd:intent grill staged under itd-27; the intent chapter says itd-27 is superseded
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/04-naming.md:43— "/abcd:intent grillis staged (itd-27), and nointent grillsub-verb is registered" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:319— "(per itd-27,intents/superseded/, superseded by itd-94; no grill sub-verb ships)"
04-naming records /abcd:intent grill as staged (itd-27), which under the truth rule means a decided design target, while 05-intent records itd-27 as superseded by itd-94 with no grill sub-verb. The sub-verb cannot be staged on an intent the record has retired.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 42.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262030468053 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262030468053-the-naming-register-marks-abcd-intent.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions3
- iss-261026203115329204-naming registers /abcd:intent grill as a staged sub-verb under itd-27; the build sequence says itd-27's grilling is the planning interview under itd-94, which supersedes it.
- itd-27Domain Experts Get Their Intents Grilled Before Anyone Codes Them
- itd-94An intent that is not planned cannot be implemented: abcd gains a machine-checkable implement-readiness gate that refuses with a remedy and offers the planning interview