This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

04-naming registers /abcd:intent grill as a staged sub-verb under itd-27; the build sequence says itd-27's grilling is the planning interview under itd-94, which supersedes it.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262031153292

04-naming registers /abcd:intent grill as a staged sub-verb under itd-27; the build sequence says itd-27's grilling is the planning interview under itd-94, which supersedes it.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/04-naming.md:117 — "/abcd:intent grill <itd-N> (itd-27)"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/01-build-sequence.md:100 — "the grilling itd-27 asked for is the planning interview"

04-naming lists '/abcd:intent grill <itd-N> (itd-27)' among the sub-verbs that are staged, named to hold the shape, which under the truth rule is a decided design target. The build sequence says there is no grill sub-verb because 'the grilling itd-27 asked for is the planning interview', abcd intent interview, under itd-94, which supersedes it. A sub-verb cannot remain the staged target of itd-27 when itd-27 is superseded and its grilling is delivered by another verb.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 105.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262030468053. Same claim in the same register (grill staged under itd-27) against the same fact (itd-27 superseded, grilling delivered by the planning interview under itd-94).

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262031153292
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

mentions4