itd-21 files the starter intent as itd-1, an id the collision-proof minting invariant does not allocate

itd-21 files the starter intent as itd-1, an id the collision-proof minting invariant does not allocate

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-21-no-lifeboat-scaffolding.md:32 — "Starter intent (/abcd:intent interview kicked off as last step) capturing the project's mission as itd-1"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/03-invariants.md:159 — "the mint never allocates by looking at the current maximum"

itd-21 ends its scaffold with an interview capturing the project's mission as itd-1. Invariant 11 says record ids are collision-proof by construction and the mint never allocates by looking at the current maximum. A fixed or next-ordinal itd-1 is neither, and two minters would both claim it, so the draft depends on an id the allocator does not produce.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 151.